
It wouldn't be so bad if she was only on if she was on.....
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
It wouldn't be so bad if she was only on if she was on.....around the Holidays, not just about everyday of the week for what seems like hours on end. I really wish Hallmark would bring back the old line-up. At least the Golden Girls are on weeknights @11pm, at least most of the time they are unless there's a movie, etc. They either won't be on at all or will be at 11:30. Why would Hallmark think anyone would want to watch MS so much
![]()
Re: It wouldn't be so bad if she was only on if she was on..Hallmark wants a vibrant future as a great family channel - bringing back the "old line-up" is a certain noose for that future. Martha Stewart embodies excellent, quality how-to programming that promises Hallmark a bright future. Obviously, Hallmark believed it had quality viewers who would appreciate excellent programming. All of the outdated reruns are still on with new times; but a bright future for Hallmark envisions less outdated reruns and more Martha Stewart Living programming. That's the reality for rerun fans, and quality Hallmark viewers should appreciate and enjoy the excellent programming of Martha Stewart Living.
Re: It wouldn't be so bad if she was only on if she was on..Is it really necessary to have Martha, Little House On The Prairie and other shows on 3 hours a day??????????? It only disappoints viewers.
Re: It wouldn't be so bad if she was only on if she was on..
I agree, I mean Martha being on for 3 hrs daily is WAY to much. I just wish they would stop having her on so much.
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Return to The Martha Stewart Show Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests |